When "GRAVITY" doen't fail.
Oct. 16th, 2013 11:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Sorry, couldn't resist a reference to George Alec Effinger's novel.
Anyway, I went to see GRAVITY tonight. Everyone has already seen the trailers and so knows what it's about (and whether they want to see it), so I won't bother telling you what you already know. There is a word that I am trying use sparingly in my vocabulary because it is WAY overused. That word is "awesome"*. GRAVITY is awesome. Visually beautiful, tense and yes, at many moments absolutely terrifying. I don't often sit on the edge of my seat clutching my hat, but I did during several sequences tonight. I'm not going to try and convince anyone to see it if they've already made up their mind, but if you're wondering, I will nudge you toward giving it a try.
This year has been interesting for movies; with the theaters filled with TV Show reboots, giant robots and yet more comic book movies, I have seen two very good honest-to-Gaia science fiction movies. Movies where you don't have to leave your brain outside. The other was OBLIVION. Very refreshing indeed.
*Awesome: filling one with a sense of awe. Examples: the rising of the sun or the moon, the night sky, seeing Saturn's rings through telescope, a thunder and lightning storm in full fury (even at a distance), the Grand Canyon, a book that changes your view of the world, a piece of art that makes you weep. Movies can be awesome(especially the first time you see them); Lord of the Rings and Terry Gilliam's early movies spring to mind. Finding a quarter is not awesome. Cheese dip is not awesome. It's good, but its not awesome.
Anyway, I went to see GRAVITY tonight. Everyone has already seen the trailers and so knows what it's about (and whether they want to see it), so I won't bother telling you what you already know. There is a word that I am trying use sparingly in my vocabulary because it is WAY overused. That word is "awesome"*. GRAVITY is awesome. Visually beautiful, tense and yes, at many moments absolutely terrifying. I don't often sit on the edge of my seat clutching my hat, but I did during several sequences tonight. I'm not going to try and convince anyone to see it if they've already made up their mind, but if you're wondering, I will nudge you toward giving it a try.
This year has been interesting for movies; with the theaters filled with TV Show reboots, giant robots and yet more comic book movies, I have seen two very good honest-to-Gaia science fiction movies. Movies where you don't have to leave your brain outside. The other was OBLIVION. Very refreshing indeed.
*Awesome: filling one with a sense of awe. Examples: the rising of the sun or the moon, the night sky, seeing Saturn's rings through telescope, a thunder and lightning storm in full fury (even at a distance), the Grand Canyon, a book that changes your view of the world, a piece of art that makes you weep. Movies can be awesome(especially the first time you see them); Lord of the Rings and Terry Gilliam's early movies spring to mind. Finding a quarter is not awesome. Cheese dip is not awesome. It's good, but its not awesome.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 10:56 pm (UTC)That and I can't imagine there's a whole lot of dialog, and if 2001 did nothing but bore me to tears, I'm afraid 'gravity' would probably end up doing the same thing to me. :(
'Oblivion' DID rule though, didn't it? It made the hubby and I both decide that Tom Cruise should just do sci-fi movies. They're the only ones he seems to do halfway decent in. XD
......and I happened to like some of those movies you mentioned. Especially the one with the giant robots. Must be the otaku in me. XD
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 11:58 pm (UTC)More dialog than you would think. George Clooney's character is a seasoned astronaut on his last mission who has a penchant for gabbiness. And trust me you won't be bored (lots of action and it's only 90 minutes long).
I don't really care for Tom Cruise myself but as Barb said; "I forgot I was watching Tom Cruise."
Hey, didn't say I didn't like those other movies (the night before, we were showing PACIFIC RIM to some friends and we were all laughing our asses off). I'll always have soft spot in my heart for Star Trek (it introduced me to the greater universe of science fiction and fantasy--and got me starting to read for fun, for that matter, but really? Khan again?). It was just nice to see something original for a change--where I didn't know how it was going to end before I went into the theater, and didn't insult my intelligence by explaining everything that was happening.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-18 01:40 pm (UTC)I've been a 'Star Trek' fan for...REALLY LONG time! XD I was afraid I'd loathe the reboot...but I actually did like it. [McCoy was my favorite char from the original , and LOVED Karl Urban's version....wish they'd show MORE of him! LOL] But yeah, after the originality [more or less, considering they *were* Romulans] of the first one, I thought it was a bit lame to retread 'Wrath of Khan' for the second. Of course, it could have been worse, we could have gotten V'ger again..... XD
no subject
Date: 2013-10-19 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-19 04:35 pm (UTC)It's REALLY SAD that I apparently didn't pay a whole lot of attention to the soundtrack for the 'first' one...it's totally not coming to mind [and THIS from the girl who RAN OUT after seeing 'The Hobbit' to grab the soundtrack JUST FOR the dwarves' version of 'Misty Mountain'.... XD Picked it up on the way home from seeing it. LOL] Need to scrape together the money for the ripping program, darn it! Now I wanna watch it and it's not been put back on the MythTV box yet....:P